1k
499
0
199
388
3471Democratic Whip Katherine Clark took a swipe at Republicans this week, accusing them of economic hypocrisy and double standards when it comes to economic policy.
In a post on X, Clark wrote, “A tax on billionaires is ‘disruptive’—but tariffs are ‘medicine’ that you need to swallow. That’s the Republicans’ economic agenda right there.”
Millionaires, Billionaires, and Taxes
Clark’s comments came shortly after President Donald Trump weighed in on taxing the wealthy.
In an interview published by Time, Trump said he would “love” a millionaire tax, but admitted he feared it could result in losing an election.
“Well, I’ll tell ya, I certainly don’t mind having a tax increase,” Trump said. “But I don’t want to be in a position where we lose an election because I was generous.”
Despite his supposed openness to the idea, Trump publicly opposed new taxes on millionaires during a press conference, warning that “a lot of the millionaires would leave the country.”
He added, “The old days, they left states. Now with transportation so quick and so easy, they leave countries.”
Trump also stressed that he would be “honored” to pay more taxes personally but worried that even a minor tax increase could be “used against me politically, because I’ve seen people lose elections for less, especially with the fake news.”
Tariffs and the Economy
In the same Time interview, Trump vigorously defended his tariff policies.
“We’re taking in billions and billions of dollars from other countries that we never took in before,” Trump said.
He framed tariffs not as a burden but as a crucial “medicine” for America’s long-term economic health. “Total victory,” Trump said when asked if maintaining high tariffs would be a success.
“Because the country will be making a fortune.”
He also noted that companies could avoid tariffs entirely by manufacturing in the U.S., saying, “There are no tariffs if they make their product here.”
Social Media Reactions: A Mixed Bag
Clark’s post sparked a wave of reactions online.
Some users supported higher taxes on the wealthy, arguing that millionaires should pay more and that their departure would not harm the country.
“Let them leave! They should be taxed higher. It is only right…,” one poster wrote.
Another added, “Millionaires didn’t leave the country when Eisenhower was President and tax rates were 90% on millionaires.”
Others saw tariffs as an indirect way of taxing corporations.
“Tariffs LITERALLY tax the corporations you say you hate,” one comment said, laughing off the controversy.
Yet others noted that if millionaires do not physically leave, many find ways to avoid taxes through offshore accounts and shell companies.
Trump’s Balancing Act
Trump’s remarks highlight the balancing act he faces. On one hand, taxing the wealthy could help fund his “big, beautiful bill” to sustain government programs through a mix of spending cuts and revenue increases.
On the other hand, he risks alienating a Republican base traditionally opposed to tax hikes.
His advisers, including Newt Gingrich and Larry Kudlow, argue that any new taxes would break Trump’s promise to lower taxes.
Speaker Mike Johnson and GOP Senators Dave McCormick and Ted Cruz also voiced opposition.
Trump tried to thread the needle, saying, “I’d be raising [taxes] on wealthy to take care of middle class. And that’s—I love that. I actually love the concept, but I don’t want it to be used against me politically.”
As Clark’s post suggests, the debate over taxes and tariffs reflects deeper divides in the Republican Party and broader disagreements about who should bear the cost of running the country.
With the 2025 elections approaching, both sides are weighing their words carefully—but voters are paying close attention.
For Katherine Clark, the focus is on presenting Democrats as the party ready to tax the ultra-wealthy while pushing back against Republican policies she believes shift the burden onto working families.
1k4990199
3883471
