Mark Cuban Firing, Slashing Programs Could Hurt The Economy
Mark Cuban Firing, Slashing Programs Could Hurt The Economy

Mark Cuban Says, ‘Cutting Costs Is A Great Goal.’ But Firing, Slashing Programs Could Hurt The Economy—’Which May Be What Musk Wants’

Please share:
RSS1k
Follow by Email499
Facebook0
X (Twitter)199
LinkedIn388
Share
3471

Billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban is sounding the alarm over how aggressive cost-cutting measures could damage the U.S. economy—and he’s not ruling out the idea that Elon Musk might be fine with that outcome.

In a recent social media post, Cuban shared his thoughts on government spending, debt and economic policy, warning that without a sound strategy, simply slashing costs can have serious side effects.

“Cutting costs is a great goal,” Cuban wrote. “Firing, cutting programs and tariffs all at once could create real economic issues for the country, which may be what Musk wants. He did say before the election that it would get really bad for the first couple years.”

Cuban Criticizes Pandemic Spending and Its Aftermath

Cuban didn’t place the blame on one party. He said both Donald Trump and Joe Biden spent heavily during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in a “debt hole that is going to be hard to get out of.”

“That’s how business works,” he said. “Great goal, no strategy or tactics to get there—you fail. But in business, when it’s your own money, you can make mistakes and cover them up by spending more. It’s completely different when it’s taxpayer money and the economy as a whole. Mistakes can have significant consequences.”

The message struck a chord with many users, but it also sparked debate. One commenter replied, “Of course all of the people who had nothing to say when we got into this mess have ‘advice’ for the people trying to clean it up now.”

Another user added, “When taxpayer money gets misspent and covered up like it’s just part of the game, the real problem is the lack of accountability. No one’s guarding the gate.”

Crypto and Young Voters: A Missed Opportunity?

Cuban has also recently weighed in on the Biden administration’s handling of cryptocurrency. In a series of Bluesky posts, he argued that SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s enforcement-heavy approach hurt young male investors—and Democrats at the polls.

“If Biden would have approached crypto this way, via regulation instead of litigation, young men would have seen their net worths skyrocket, and voted for Harris,” Cuban said.

He pointed to Pew Research data showing that 42% of men ages 18 to 29 have invested in, traded or used cryptocurrency. That compares to just 17% of women in the same age group.

“Young men don’t open bank accounts. They are too expensive. They download Coinbase or Robinhood app and buy crypto. That’s their savings. If one party pushes that number higher, they vote for ’em. Gensler/Biden caused those savings to go down,” Cuban wrote.

He shared a Bitcoin News article highlighting a shift in tone from Acting SEC Chair Mark T. Uyeda, who recently said the Commission should rely more on rulemaking than enforcement when regulating digital assets.

“This approach of using notice-and-comment rulemaking… rather than through enforcement actions—should have been considered for classifying crypto assets,” Uyeda said.

For Cuban, that shift just reinforces his point: the Biden administration missed a chance to win over a key demographic by getting crypto policy wrong.

Please share:
RSS1k
Follow by Email499
Facebook0
X (Twitter)199
LinkedIn388
Share
3471